“Blocking the creation of the Defense Procurement Agency Supervisory Board brings back corruption hell in arms procurement.” What, it can’t be!?
The one who says this today tops the rating of anti-corruption officials who use this image for their own selfish purposes. It’s interesting, but the question immediately arises of what to do with his previous statements:
22.VI.2024. “The appointment of Sytnik as Bezrukova’s deputy at the Defense Procurement Agency (DPA) is a very cool personnel decision... This is a very clear and understandable signal to the corrupt intelligence services (and other black players in the arms market).”
7.VII.2024. “After Bezrukova, 60% of contracts were concluded DIRECTLY with weapons manufacturers. 70% of them are with Ukrainian companies to develop their own production.”
10.VIII.2024. “Marina Bezrukova (head of the Defense Procurement Agency), in my opinion, has done the impossible over the past 7 months.” (Will they show the people all this “impossibility”?).
I think, or rather I am convinced, that the excerpts from the above message are related to the fact that one of the necessary representatives of “civil society” should once again be appointed to a lucrative position. That is, not associated with any duties, much less responsibility (sinecure or supervisory board of the AHO).
At the same time, such an explanation does not at all remove the question about the quoted messages addressed to the leaders of the AOZ MO: how can “corruption hell”, in principle, return to the AOZ at the same time when it is headed by such a cool leadership?! But the general public is still not talking about this.
